Back to blog

Stop Treating Every Video the Same

By Shootsta

shootsta.

Stop Treating Every Video the Same

By Shootsta · Published August 5, 2026 · Updated August 2026

Stop Treating Every Video the Same

Treating every video the same is one of the most expensive mistakes enterprise teams make. Chad Lakin breaks down the three jobs video does, and how to put the right resources behind each one.

One of the most expensive mistakes enterprise teams make is treating every video the same. Not all of it has the same job. Produce it all the same way and you overspend on the work that only needed to be quick, and flatten the work that should have stopped people in their tracks.

In this clip, Chad Lakin, Senior Vice President of Growth at Shootsta, walks through the Peak, Pulse, Presence framework, and why it has caught on as a way for enterprise teams to think about scaling video.

Watch the clip above, then here is how the three fit together and where to spend on each.

What are Peak, Pulse and Presence?

The framework sorts your video by the job it does rather than the format it takes. Name the job first, and the right budget, speed and level of polish tend to fall out on their own.

Peak: big brand moments

Peak is the high-craft work: the brand films and campaigns that create visibility and set how the market sees you. Product launches, your best customer stories, the keynote. This is the stuff worth going big on. It is also a small slice of everything you make, which is exactly why it should get the biggest budget.

Pulse: consistent communication

Pulse is the steady rhythm that keeps you credible between the big moments. Thought leadership, customer stories, event highlights, executive updates. None of it needs to be a hero film. It just needs to keep coming, week after week, at a standard that does not embarrass the brand.

Presence: everyday trust

Presence is the human stuff: leaders, employees and customers talking to camera like actual people. Sales videos, internal comms, FAQ and how-to clips, the quick culture snippet. It earns trust over time because it feels real rather than produced. Polish it too hard and you kill the thing that made it work.

Why does the framework matter for your budget?

Because getting it wrong costs you quietly, in two directions. Spend a Peak budget on Pulse content and you have burned hero-film money and weeks of timeline on something that only needed to be consistent and on time. Produce Presence content like a Peak campaign and it stops feeling real, because the polish is the exact thing that makes it read as staged.

Once you can name the role each video plays, putting the right resources in the right place gets a lot easier. It is the same shift behind treating video as a capability rather than a campaign, and the reason no single production model absorbs enterprise video volume. Different jobs, different models.

How do you resource each one?

Free Playbook

Get the video operating model playbook

How teams produce and scale video across every business touchpoint without agency retainers or new headcount. Free to download.

Naming the three is only useful if it changes what you do next. Here is where each one belongs.

Peak. Low volume, high craft. This is where your agency earns its fee, or where Shootsta Premier handles the premium one-offs. Put the big budget here, and mostly here.

Pulse. Higher volume, and it lives or dies on speed and predictable cost. This is the job for a managed partner and a platform: brief today, first edit back in about 48 hours, so it ships while it still matters, usually at 50 to 60% below agency. That is the model behind an enterprise video editing service, and the turnaround is broken down in how a video partner ships in 48 hours.

Presence. The highest volume of the three, and it works best when your own people make it. Give leaders, sales and employees the kit, the templates and the guardrails to create on brand without a producer in the room for every clip. The trick is keeping brand consistency as video scales, so more creators does not turn into messier output.

Most teams overspend on Peak and starve the rest, which is exactly where the backlog and the wasted money pile up. Running all three at a cost and speed you can actually sustain is what the enterprise video operating model is for.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Peak, Pulse, Presence framework?

It is a way to sort enterprise video by the job it does. Peak is the high-impact brand moments that create visibility, Pulse is the regular communication that builds consistency, and Presence is the authentic, everyday content from real people that earns trust over time. Name the job for a video and you know how much budget, speed and polish it actually needs.

Which of the three do most organizations underinvest in?

Presence and Pulse, usually. Teams pour budget into the occasional Peak campaign and starve the steady content that keeps them credible in between. Pulse and Presence are the parts that compound, so under-funding them is the most common and most expensive mistake.

We already have an in-house team and an agency. Where does a partner fit?

Each covers a different job. Your agency and your in-house craft shine on Peak, where the stakes justify the time, and your team owns the brand judgment and the relationships. A managed partner takes the Pulse and Presence volume that would otherwise swamp them, so nothing stalls in the edit queue. More on that split in how a video partner extends your in-house team.

How fast can Pulse and Presence content be produced?

About 48 hours for a first edit once the footage and brief are in. That turnaround is what makes a steady Pulse cadence and high-volume Presence content realistic, rather than a nice idea that never ships.

Where to go next

For the full system that runs all three, read the enterprise video operating model. For why one production approach can't carry every job, read why one model can't scale enterprise video. And when the whole load lands on one hire, read what happens when your whole video team is one person.

Which of the three does your team underinvest in? Naming it is usually the first step to fixing where the budget goes.

Book a video strategy call

Take this article with you

Free. Forward it, print it, or drop it into a deck.

Share this article

Read the latest at shootsta.com/blog/stop-treating-every-video-the-same

You might also like

ShootstaVideo Strategy

How to Speed Up Corporate Video Review Workflows

shootsta.com/blogRead article
Video Strategy

How to Speed Up Corporate Video Review Workflows

Review and approval is usually the slowest part of corporate video, not the edit. Here is how to cut a 2 to 3 week review cycle down to a few days: one approver, parallel review against the brief, timestamped feedback in one place, and a hard cap on rounds.

ShootstaVideo Strategy

What a Videographer Misses at Scale

shootsta.com/blogRead article
Video Strategy

What a Videographer Misses at Scale

A videographer plus editor handles the hero shoot well. At scale, the gaps show: turnaround, coverage, brand drift, and unpredictable cost. Here is what fills them.

How brands stay human as AI gets more capable
Video Strategy

How brands stay human as AI gets more capable

AI has made output cheap. It has not made trust cheap. Point the machine at the repetitive work, keep people on the judgement calls, and the time you free up goes into the parts nobody wants automated: real people on camera and a point of view worth having.

ShootstaVideo Strategy

Video Agency vs Video Subscription

shootsta.com/blogRead article
Video Strategy

Video Agency vs Video Subscription

A video agency is built for the big campaign. A subscription is built for ongoing volume. Here is how their cost, speed, and fit differ.

ShootstaVideo Strategy

Why One Videographer Can't Scale Video

shootsta.com/blogRead article
Video Strategy

Why One Videographer Can't Scale Video

One videographer is one point of capacity: one shoot, one location, one queue. Here is why that breaks as video volume grows, and what fixes it.

ShootstaVideo Strategy

In-House Videographer vs Outsourced Video

shootsta.com/blogRead article
Video Strategy

In-House Videographer vs Outsourced Video

Hiring an in-house videographer gives you control but fixed capacity. Outsourcing flexes with demand. A subscription gives you the control of in-house with the flex of outsourced.