The Shootsta Platform
Video review workflows for corporate marketing teams
Every reviewer comments on the same cut, on the timeline, with a version history that shows who approved what. Brand is locked before the cut reaches them, so the round is spent on the message. The first cut comes back in about 48 hours.
Trusted by LinkedIn, Qantas, CBRE, Schneider Electric, AstraZeneca, PwC, and Stryker, among 920+ brands globally.
Video review workflow
What is a video review workflow?
A video review workflow is the fixed path a cut takes from the editor to sign-off. It sets who sees the cut, in what order, where they comment, how many rounds are allowed and who approves the final version. Corporate marketing teams need one because their video passes through more hands than most. Brand, legal, a product owner and often a regional lead all get a say.
Without a video review workflow, feedback arrives by email, in a chat thread and in a meeting nobody minuted. The editor reconciles it by hand, versions multiply, and a two-minute video takes three weeks to approve. With one, every comment lands on the timeline against a timestamp. Reviewers work in parallel, and the approved version is the only one that can be published.
Shootsta builds the video review workflow into the same platform that briefs, edits and stores your video. That is the difference from a standalone proofing tool. The editor who cut the video reads the comments, and the brand kit was applied before anyone reviewed.
| Email and shared drives | Standalone review tool | Shootsta platform | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Where comments live | Inboxes, chat threads, meeting notes | On the timeline, in the tool | On the timeline, next to the brief and every version |
| Who cuts the video | Whoever you hired for this one | Your own editors | A named Shootsta editor pool |
| Brand check before review | Depends on the editor | Outside the tool's scope | Brand kit locked at the editor level |
| Version control | File names | Version stack | Numbered versions with the approval recorded |
| Reviewer access | Anyone with the link | Priced per seat | Unlimited users |
| First cut turnaround | Whatever was agreed | Your team's capacity | About 48 hours |
What is in the review workflow
Six things reviewers get on every cut
Each one removes a specific way that corporate video review goes wrong. Together they turn a three-week approval into a three-day one. Nobody who has to sign off is taken out of the video review workflow to get there.
Timestamped comments on the timeline
Click the frame and type the note. Every comment carries a timestamp, so a remark about the opening light becomes a note at 00:00:04 and the editor goes straight to it.
Draw on the frame
Drag a box around the thing you mean. A note about a logo position or a distracting object in the background is read the same way by everyone who opens it.
Numbered versions, side by side
Every cut is kept as a numbered version. Reviewers can switch between them to see what changed, and the wrong file cannot be published by mistake.
One approve button
Approving a version marks it as final and records who approved it and when. That record is the answer when someone later asks who signed the video off.
Attachments on the comment they belong to
Reference clips, screenshots and copy decks attach to the comment that needs them. One click zips every attachment for the editor, so nothing is hunted for in an inbox.
Unlimited users
Add brand, legal, the product owner and the regional lead to the project. Feedback stays on the project instead of in separate inboxes, and the review runs in parallel.
What the review workflow looks like in practice
The platform end to end, from the brief through the first cut to the approved version in your library.
How a video moves through the Shootsta platform from brief to approved cut: your team films and uploads, a regional editor returns a brand-locked first cut within 48 hours, and review runs on the timeline.
How a review runs
How does the Shootsta video review workflow work?
There are five stages. The one that decides how long the whole thing takes is the first, because naming the approver in the brief is what keeps the later rounds short.
- 1
Brief
Your team fills in a short brief that names the audience, the deliverables and the one person who approves. Naming the approver here is what stops a fifth round later.
- 2
First cut in about 48 hours
A named Shootsta editor cuts the video inside your locked brand kit. Fonts, palette, lower thirds and end card are applied by the workspace. The cut is checked against the brand kit before you see it.
- 3
Review in parallel
Every reviewer opens the same version at the same time. Comments land on the timeline with a timestamp, or as a box drawn on the frame. There is one deadline and one tie-breaker.
- 4
Submit changes
The editor works from the comment list, resolves each one and posts the next numbered version. Rounds are counted, and two is the target.
- 5
Approve and publish
One click approves the version and records who did it. The approved cut goes to your library with every aspect ratio and caption file. From there it exports to the channel or the tool you already use.
Why review the video where it was edited?
A standalone proofing tool solves the comment problem and leaves the other two alone. The editor still has to be found and briefed. The brand still has to be checked by whoever is reviewing. On the Shootsta platform the editor who cut the video reads the comments, and the brand kit was applied before the first reviewer opened the file.
That changes what a review round contains. Reviewers stop flagging fonts, logo sizes and lower-third colors, because those were locked at the editor level. They spend the round on the message, the claims and the call to action, which is the part only they can judge.
The cost side follows the same logic. Editing is priced as a fixed monthly fee covering a set number of video credits, with no per-project fees and no rush charges. Across the teams we work with, that lands 50 to 60% below what a traditional agency charges for the same volume. The video review workflow is part of the platform rather than a separate seat-based subscription.
Who uses it
Which teams need a video review workflow?
Corporate marketing teams
Campaign and brand video with brand, legal and a product owner in the loop. The review is where these projects lose weeks, so it is where the workflow earns its keep.
Internal comms teams
Leadership messages with an executive approver whose calendar is full. Parallel review and a single approve action keep the message current by the time it lands.
L&D and enablement teams
Training modules that a subject-matter expert has to check for accuracy. Timestamped notes mean the expert reviews the claim on screen rather than describing where it was.
Regulated industries
Banking, insurance, pharma and medical devices, where every approval has to be shown later. Feedback and the approval record stay on the project.
Across 70,000+ videos for 920+ brands, the pattern holds. The edit takes hours, and the approval takes weeks until the review moves onto the timeline. Customer satisfaction across post-delivery surveys sits at 4.9/5. To see where your own video review workflow is losing time first, read the seven signs a video review process is about to break.
FAQ
Video review workflow questions
What is a video review workflow?
A video review workflow is the fixed path a cut takes from the editor to sign-off. It sets who sees the cut, in what order, where they comment, how many rounds are allowed and who approves the final version. Corporate marketing teams need one because their video passes through more hands than most. Without a fixed path, the feedback arrives by email, in a chat thread and in a meeting nobody minuted.
How does the Shootsta review workflow work?
Your team briefs the video and names the approver. A Shootsta editor returns a brand-locked first cut in about 48 hours. Reviewers comment on the timeline or draw on the frame, all on the same numbered version. The editor resolves the comments and posts the next version. One click approves it. The approved cut then goes to your library with every format and caption file.
How many reviewers can be on a video?
As many as the project needs, because users are unlimited. The video review workflow works best with one named approver and a small group of reviewers. They work in parallel against the brief. That is a process choice rather than a seat limit, and it is the biggest driver of how many rounds a video takes.
Can we keep using our own review tool, such as Frame.io?
Yes. Shootsta exports finished cuts, captions and separate files, so they drop into whatever approval tool your company already runs. Teams that have a review platform usually keep it for in-house edits. They use the Shootsta review workflow for the videos Shootsta cuts, because the editor who made the cut reads the comments there.
Where is our footage stored during review?
In the region that matches your data residency requirements. Access is controlled inside the platform, so reviewers see the projects they are added to. Ownership and IP terms are set out in your agreement.
How fast can a corporate video clear review?
Two to three days from filming is a working target. It holds once review runs in parallel and the first cut is brand-checked before it arrives. The edit is rarely the slow part. The wait for a reviewer is, which is why the video review workflow names the approver in the brief and puts every comment in one place.
We already have an in-house marketing team and a review tool. Why add Shootsta?
Keep both. Your team owns the message and the sign-off. What runs out is editing time, usually in the weeks when a campaign, a leadership update and three social cutdowns land together. Shootsta absorbs that volume, returns brand-locked cuts in about 48 hours and runs the review for those videos on the same platform. Your marketers review finished work instead of chasing versions. Your existing review tool keeps doing what it does for in-house edits.
Put your next video through the workflow
Bring one video that is currently stuck in review. We will set up the brief, return a brand-locked first cut in about 48 hours and run the approval on the timeline. You judge the video review workflow on your own project rather than on a description.
Get a Free ConsultationRelated: the best video editing services for corporate reviews, how to speed up corporate video review workflows, enterprise video editing services and how the Shootsta platform works.